ATTENTIONThis FlexSim Community Forum is read-only. Please post any new questions, ideas, or discussions to our new community (we call it Answers) at https://answers.flexsim.com/. Our new Question & Answer site brings a modern, mobile-friendly interface and more focus on getting answers quickly. There are a few differences between how our new Q&A community works vs. a classic, threaded-conversation-style forum like the one below, so be sure to read our Answers Best Practices. |
flexsim.com |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Shuttle System (Rack) Modeling
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
My advice would be to not use flowitems. Store your data in a bundle global table and write your logic accordingly. Depending on what question you are trying to solve with the simulation model, you may structure your model differently.
Compatibility Mode is never going to help performance. The point of compatibility mode is to sacrifice performance for compatibility. It is a last-resort option to be used to try to make the program run on hardware that doesn't meet the specs to run the program correctly. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Phil BoBo For This Useful Post: | ||
Sung Kim (06-03-2016) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Understand and Agree
Thank you for the advice!
I thought about the approach you suggested, but hesitated a bit because of losing visual part. I know the visual part could be a trivial and only cosmetic matter, but just feel sorry for losing graphical attraction of stacking totes in the rack/cell. But this case, I think your suggestion would be the way. (Hopefully, my client generously understands this exceptional size issue ) THANKS!! |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Maybe you can switch off the compatibility mode. Then you switch off the shadows and the stereoscopic view, too. The next method could be to reduce the items by displaying only one item per cell. But then you exchange the shape, so it looks like two items are stored. Only when you retrieve an item the other one is placed back similar Phil suggested. Then the shape is changed, too.
Jörg |
The Following User Says Thank You to Jörg Vogel For This Useful Post: | ||
Sung Kim (06-10-2016) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
You can use the mesh api to draw the boxes based on the data. Having a centralized location that draws everything can render really fast compared to having a bunch of individual objects rendering themselves.
You don't need to lose the visuals. You just have to write some custom code to render them based on your data instead of using the default flowitem object drawing. That's what CT does with containers in yard blocks. That's also how the newer modules (AGV, Conveyor) render their objects: as a system instead of as individual objects. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Phil BoBo For This Useful Post: | ||
Sung Kim (06-10-2016) |
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Adding Levels to a rack by code is not updating the rack drawing | koenslootmans | Q&A | 3 | 06-19-2015 06:06 AM |
System requirement | kunal kumar | Installation | 1 | 03-04-2015 04:13 PM |
Is there a Best Practice for modeling a moving rack? | Steffen Hainke | Tips and Tricks | 1 | 06-23-2014 09:32 AM |
loading and unloading by shuttle car | Krish Vignesh | Q&A | 1 | 01-22-2014 11:20 AM |
Shuttle rack system | Manoj Kumar | Q&A | 3 | 08-02-2012 01:07 AM |