ATTENTIONThis FlexSim Community Forum is read-only. Please post any new questions, ideas, or discussions to our new community (we call it Answers) at https://answers.flexsim.com/. Our new Question & Answer site brings a modern, mobile-friendly interface and more focus on getting answers quickly. There are a few differences between how our new Q&A community works vs. a classic, threaded-conversation-style forum like the one below, so be sure to read our Answers Best Practices. |
flexsim.com |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Unknown setup time of a processor
Hi,
In order to set up a processor, an operator has to do several tasks (tasksequence: get tools at different places), so the setup time is unknown. Is there a simple way to use the setup functionality of a processor, and to end the setup by e.g. sending a message to the processor? Could e.g. a very long setup time be chosen, and the setup finished by a trigger? Or could e.g. a MultiProcessor be used, and the step from Process1 to Process2 triggered by something? Until now, I have had to put a queue in front of the processor, close the output, send messages to the processor (setstate(Processor,STATE_SETUP)) and then to the queue (openoutput(Queue)). Thanks in advance Stefan |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I think you are looking for a way to preempt the setup task for operator.
This gives the possibility to the operator, to do other tasks, with other priority. It should be possible by ticking "preemt" in the processor gui. Probably this will make some problems, if your operator is involved in process even.
__________________
Hemmi |
The Following User Says Thank You to Sebastian Hemmann For This Useful Post: | ||
Stefan Trabut (04-02-2011) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Here's an alternative using an altered PickOperator option for MultipleTeams which may help form a basis for a solution. Just for an example I've given each operator two random travel tasks to be completed as part of the setup.
If you use operators for process you'd need to alter the case statement and put breaks in if they are to do something different. If you just have one operator it should be fine as it is, however with a team - the current code will set the state back to waiting for operator as soon as the first operator is finished. With some tweaking this could be rectified. . |
The Following User Says Thank You to Jason Lightfoot For This Useful Post: | ||
Stefan Trabut (04-02-2011) |
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unknown error | David Chan | Container Terminal (CT) Library | 1 | 11-22-2010 12:58 PM |
New Hardware Setup | Alistair Smitheman | Installation | 3 | 03-20-2009 03:07 AM |
No Setup | Nico Zahn | Q&A | 2 | 08-25-2008 12:38 AM |
How to report setup cost? | jbruxelle | Q&A | 1 | 09-05-2007 12:07 PM |
use of operator for transport and setup | Pablo Concha | Q&A | 2 | 08-23-2007 11:30 AM |