ATTENTIONThis FlexSim Community Forum is read-only. Please post any new questions, ideas, or discussions to our new community (we call it Answers) at https://answers.flexsim.com/. Our new Question & Answer site brings a modern, mobile-friendly interface and more focus on getting answers quickly. There are a few differences between how our new Q&A community works vs. a classic, threaded-conversation-style forum like the one below, so be sure to read our Answers Best Practices. |
flexsim.com |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
how could I get opeartors move during processing?
Hi,there comes a newbie on flexsim,what i wanna ask is that - When processor uses operators for operating ,how could I get the person move just like in the reality? As in my model,during the whole process,the operator keeped still all the time.
Thanks. Last edited by zoeygollum; 07-16-2010 at 03:26 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Hi,
the answer is easy: give the operator something else to do. A possible solution is to add another processor (no.2), which uses the same operator for its processing. Your first processor should have a higher priority and be preempting. The distracting processor (no.2) has always something to do. Set the process time to a high value e.g. the simulation stop time. Another way is a bit more complicated. Write your own tasksequence or use a globaltasksequence, which the operater has to do after process finish. Use therefor the OnProcessFinish trigger in the processor. The operator has to leave the processor only, if there is nothing more to process. Then you send a delayed message of 1 second to your processor. In the Onmessage trigger you can decide, what the operator can do: send him away by a tasksequence or let him process. Jörg |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jörg Vogel For This Useful Post: | ||
Tom David (07-16-2010) |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Jörg,
is it wright that this way the Operator will walk around? I understood the question that way, the operator should move it´s arms on Processor like he would work in reality. And don´t only stands still in front of the processor while being in process. Wouldn´t this be possible with animationcreator and for example any trigger?
__________________
Hemmi |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sebastian Hemmann For This Useful Post: | ||
Tom David (07-17-2010) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
[QUOTE=Sebastian Hemmann;6637] I understood the question that way, the operator should move it´s arms on Processor like he would work in reality. And don´t only stands still in front of the processor while being in process.
QUOTE] Yes,Sebastian understand me correctly. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Then Sebastian is correct, if you want to have Animation/Visualization of the operator during the process you should use the animation creator. You could use the OnEntry trigger of the Processor to start your own animation with the command startanimation(); and the OnProcessFinish trigger to stop the animation with the command stopanimation();.
In this Thread “Animation Creator” is a small model from Anthony where the operator moves his head. Maybe this is useful for you.
__________________
tom the (A)tom: "We have solved our problems ... now we have to fight the solutions." |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tom David For This Useful Post: | ||
Sebastian Hemmann (07-18-2010) |
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Setup/processing order problems | Derrick Serbonich | Q&A | 2 | 07-09-2009 01:27 AM |
Continuously Move | Li Chin | Q&A | 12 | 10-13-2008 03:49 AM |
Robot processing | Sung Kim | Q&A | 7 | 08-27-2008 06:48 AM |
Using a Variable number of Operators for Processing | Brandon Peterson | Tips and Tricks | 4 | 07-16-2008 09:16 AM |
Crane Move | Sung Kim | Q&A | 2 | 06-05-2008 03:03 PM |